United States v. Allred
(On consideration of the entire record, the finding of guilty of The Specification of Additional Charge IV and Additional Charge IV is SET ASIDE and that Specification and Additional Charge is DISMISSED. )
United States v. Anderson
United States v. Ayalacruz
United States v. Bickford
United States v. Brown
(The findings of guilty to Specification 2 of Charge II and to Charge II are set aside. Specification 2 of Charge II and Charge II are dismissed with prejudice.)
United States v. Boyle
United States v. Butler
United States v. Calhoun
(Findings as to Specification 13, of Charge 1 Set Aside and Dismissed.)
United States v. Cabral
United States v. Coloncordero
(The findings of guilty of Specifications 1 and 2 of The Charge and The Charge are AFFIRMED. The findings of guilty of Specifications 4, 5, and 6 of The Charge are conditionally SET ASIDE and conditionally DISMISSED.)
United States v. Cooper
United States v. Covitz
(Findings and sentence set aside.)
United States v. Daniels
United States v. Ellis
(The findings and sentence are set aside. The record is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy for remand to an appropriate CA with a rehearing authorized.)
United States v. Ferguson
United States v. Gardiner
United States v. Grigoruk
United States v. Hale
(The findings and sentence were set aside).
United States v. Hernandez
(The findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority are affirmed. The supplemental court-martial order will reflect sexual “contact” instead of sexual “act” in Specification 2 of Charge II.)
United States v. Hiser
United States v. Jeffries
United States v. Jesko
(Specification 1 of Charge I and Specification 8 of Charge III, to which appellant pled guilty, are SET ASIDE. )
United States v. Jungklaus Dadona
United States v. King
United States v. Lavergne
United States v. Leonard
(The decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is reversed. The findings and sentence are set aside and a rehearing is authorized.)
United States v. Mahler
United States v. Marcus
United States v. Masga
United States v. Martin
United States v. Marshall
United States v. Montgomery
United States v. Moulton
United States v. Novak
(We set aside the guilty finding to Charge I and its sole specification and dismiss Charge 1 and its specification.)
United States v. Penn
U.S. v. Pitre
(The court affirms only so much of the findings of guilty of The Specification of Charge III,)
United States v. Pflug
(The finding of guilty as to Specification 2 of Charge I and the sentence are set aside).
United States v. Reshke
United States v. Riojas
United States v. Roberts
(The Convening Authority's initial action was set aside).
United States v. Rodriguez
(On consideration of the entire record, the finding of guilty as to Specification 4 of Charge II is SET ASIDE and DISMISSED. )
United States v. Rushatz
United States v. Scott
(Accordingly, the record of trial and all related appellate documents are returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy for transmittal to the appropriate convening authority. )
United States v. Smith
United States v. St. Jean
United States v. Sutton
(The decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals was reversed. The finding of guilty to the charge and its specification and the sentence are set aside. The charge and specification are dismissed.)
United States v. Tavares
United States v. Vela
United States v. Vidal
(The Convening Authority's initial action was set aside. Charges were eventually dismissed and an administrative resolution occurred).
U.S. v. Washington
United States v. Weatherspoon
United States v. Wible
United States v. Williams
Andrews v. Webb
Barrett v. McHugh
Bond v. United States
Bublitz v. Brownlee
(FURTHER ORDERED that this action shall be TRANSFERRED to the Court of Federal Claims.)
Charette v. Walker
Chenault v. McHugh
Cook v. United States
Daniels v. United States
Ey v. McHugh
Gilbert v. James
(ORDERED that this matter be STAYED, temporarily, to allow for reconsideration de novo by the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records, of the plaintiffs' petitions for correction of their military records, pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 1552; and it is further
ORDERED that the parties shall file, by March 31, 2016, and every ninety days thereafter, a joint status report describing the progress of the consideration of the plaintiffs' petitions.)
Gilbert v. Wilson
Homer v. Roche
"For the reasons stated in the Court's accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is herebyORDERED that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED."
Hoskins v. United States
Ingham v. United States
Magenson v. Mabus
McDonough v. Mabus
Metz v. United States
(For the reasons set forth above, plaintiff's motion for judgment is GRANTED. The clerk shall enter judgment awarding MSgt. Metz relief as follows: (1) back pay in the amount of $30,300.74 for the period from September 9, 1994 through October 30, 1995;
(2) early retirement starting on October 31, 1995, back retirement pay in the grade of E–7 from October 31, 1995 to the present, and retirement pay for the remainder of MSgt. Metz's natural life; (3) expurgation of all references to MSgt. Metz's separation in lieu of court-martial from his record.)
Kosnik v. Peters
Lopez-Velazquez v. United States
Ludlow v. Mabus
(Plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgement granted).
Nishitani v. United States
Poole v. Harvey
"The court concludes that Poole's motion for summary judgment must be granted insofar as it contends that the ABCMR's decision is arbitrary and capricious and denied insofar as it requests that this court order Poole's retroactive promotion."
Price v. United States
Schaefer v. Geren
Shrader v. United States
Aquino v. Stone
Widmer v. Stokes
Unger v. Ziemniak
Rebosky v. U.S.
Schaefer v. White
Martin v. United States
Nation v. Dalton
Anderson v. United States
Clark v. Widnall
Miller v. Roche
Cochrane v. Wynne
Scott v. United States
Chambers v. Green
Lassalle v. Geren
(On consideration of the entire record, the finding of guilty of The Specification of Additional Charge IV and Additional Charge IV is SET ASIDE and that Specification and Additional Charge is DISMISSED. )
United States v. Anderson
United States v. Ayalacruz
United States v. Bickford
United States v. Brown
(The findings of guilty to Specification 2 of Charge II and to Charge II are set aside. Specification 2 of Charge II and Charge II are dismissed with prejudice.)
United States v. Boyle
United States v. Butler
United States v. Calhoun
(Findings as to Specification 13, of Charge 1 Set Aside and Dismissed.)
United States v. Cabral
United States v. Coloncordero
(The findings of guilty of Specifications 1 and 2 of The Charge and The Charge are AFFIRMED. The findings of guilty of Specifications 4, 5, and 6 of The Charge are conditionally SET ASIDE and conditionally DISMISSED.)
United States v. Cooper
United States v. Covitz
(Findings and sentence set aside.)
United States v. Daniels
United States v. Ellis
(The findings and sentence are set aside. The record is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy for remand to an appropriate CA with a rehearing authorized.)
United States v. Ferguson
United States v. Gardiner
United States v. Grigoruk
United States v. Hale
(The findings and sentence were set aside).
United States v. Hernandez
(The findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority are affirmed. The supplemental court-martial order will reflect sexual “contact” instead of sexual “act” in Specification 2 of Charge II.)
United States v. Hiser
United States v. Jeffries
United States v. Jesko
(Specification 1 of Charge I and Specification 8 of Charge III, to which appellant pled guilty, are SET ASIDE. )
United States v. Jungklaus Dadona
United States v. King
United States v. Lavergne
United States v. Leonard
(The decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is reversed. The findings and sentence are set aside and a rehearing is authorized.)
United States v. Mahler
United States v. Marcus
United States v. Masga
United States v. Martin
United States v. Marshall
United States v. Montgomery
United States v. Moulton
United States v. Novak
(We set aside the guilty finding to Charge I and its sole specification and dismiss Charge 1 and its specification.)
United States v. Penn
U.S. v. Pitre
(The court affirms only so much of the findings of guilty of The Specification of Charge III,)
United States v. Pflug
(The finding of guilty as to Specification 2 of Charge I and the sentence are set aside).
United States v. Reshke
United States v. Riojas
United States v. Roberts
(The Convening Authority's initial action was set aside).
United States v. Rodriguez
(On consideration of the entire record, the finding of guilty as to Specification 4 of Charge II is SET ASIDE and DISMISSED. )
United States v. Rushatz
United States v. Scott
(Accordingly, the record of trial and all related appellate documents are returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy for transmittal to the appropriate convening authority. )
United States v. Smith
United States v. St. Jean
United States v. Sutton
(The decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals was reversed. The finding of guilty to the charge and its specification and the sentence are set aside. The charge and specification are dismissed.)
United States v. Tavares
United States v. Vela
United States v. Vidal
(The Convening Authority's initial action was set aside. Charges were eventually dismissed and an administrative resolution occurred).
U.S. v. Washington
United States v. Weatherspoon
United States v. Wible
United States v. Williams
Andrews v. Webb
Barrett v. McHugh
Bond v. United States
Bublitz v. Brownlee
(FURTHER ORDERED that this action shall be TRANSFERRED to the Court of Federal Claims.)
Charette v. Walker
Chenault v. McHugh
Cook v. United States
Daniels v. United States
Ey v. McHugh
Gilbert v. James
(ORDERED that this matter be STAYED, temporarily, to allow for reconsideration de novo by the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records, of the plaintiffs' petitions for correction of their military records, pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 1552; and it is further
ORDERED that the parties shall file, by March 31, 2016, and every ninety days thereafter, a joint status report describing the progress of the consideration of the plaintiffs' petitions.)
Gilbert v. Wilson
Homer v. Roche
"For the reasons stated in the Court's accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is herebyORDERED that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED."
Hoskins v. United States
Ingham v. United States
Magenson v. Mabus
McDonough v. Mabus
Metz v. United States
(For the reasons set forth above, plaintiff's motion for judgment is GRANTED. The clerk shall enter judgment awarding MSgt. Metz relief as follows: (1) back pay in the amount of $30,300.74 for the period from September 9, 1994 through October 30, 1995;
(2) early retirement starting on October 31, 1995, back retirement pay in the grade of E–7 from October 31, 1995 to the present, and retirement pay for the remainder of MSgt. Metz's natural life; (3) expurgation of all references to MSgt. Metz's separation in lieu of court-martial from his record.)
Kosnik v. Peters
Lopez-Velazquez v. United States
Ludlow v. Mabus
(Plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgement granted).
Nishitani v. United States
Poole v. Harvey
"The court concludes that Poole's motion for summary judgment must be granted insofar as it contends that the ABCMR's decision is arbitrary and capricious and denied insofar as it requests that this court order Poole's retroactive promotion."
Price v. United States
Schaefer v. Geren
Shrader v. United States
Aquino v. Stone
Widmer v. Stokes
Unger v. Ziemniak
Rebosky v. U.S.
Schaefer v. White
Martin v. United States
Nation v. Dalton
Anderson v. United States
Clark v. Widnall
Miller v. Roche
Cochrane v. Wynne
Scott v. United States
Chambers v. Green
Lassalle v. Geren
